Skip to content
HHackerTube.videoSurprise me

All the Numbers - Numberphile

All the Numbers - Numberphile on HackerTube: recommended by 6 Hacker News commenters across 6 separate months, 2019–2025.

Numberphile

explainer · intro · evergreen

Open on YouTube

Matt Parker talks Numberphile through the different kinds of numbers: algebraic, transcendental, computable, normal, and beyond. It shows how few numbers we can actually name or describe.

Why Hacker News recommends it

HN recommends it as an accessible explanation of number categories and why almost all numbers are unknowable.

people recommended it
6
separate months
6
strong recommendations
1
discussed on HN
2019–2025
“here's a video that explains from the basics what kinds of numbers exist”
— mjlee, Mar 2019, in “Famous Transcendental Numbers”

What HN commenters said

12 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.

ccvannormanAug 2019Strongly recommends

It's fascinating how little we know about everyday numbers like pi and e, it's widely assumed that they are normal but there is no proof for this (and it's extremely difficult to do so). In fact we believe the fast majority of numbers are transcendental and normal but we only actually know of a single normal number, and it is a manufactured number. Numberphile has an excellent video on the numbers we know about and the quest to find / define normal numbers: ▶ this video

in “Is e Normal?” · View on HN

gcanyonOct 2025Recommends

You might appreciate this video where Matt Parker lays out the various classes of numbers and concludes by describing the normal numbers as being the overwhelmingly vast proportion of numbers and laments "we mathematicians think we know what's what, but so far we have found none of the numbers." ▶ this video

in “The Unknotting Number Is Not Additive” · View on HN

gcanyonFeb 2025Recommends

This video parallels the article, going further. I love the tag line, "We know none of the numbers." ▶ this video

in “The number line freaks me out (2016)” · View on HN

deepspaceAug 2020Recommends

I found Matt Parker's video to be a good way to visualize the fact that we 'know' essentailly 0% of numbers: ▶ this video

in “How real are real numbers? (2004)” · View on HN

KboPAacDA3Jan 2020Recommends

Numberphile has a video explaining the relationship between the number categories, and includes a brief discussion of where Chaitin's Constant belongs. ▶ this video

in “Chaitin's Constant” · View on HN

StrangeDoctorMar 2019Recommends

That's actually most numbers, but we don't know any yet. ▶ this video numberphile (math YouTube series) describing some related concepts here.

in “Calculating a record-breaking 31.4T digits of Pi with GCP” · View on HN

Show 6 more comments
mjleeMar 2019Recommends

It feels like every time there's a mathematics post on the front page I post a video by Matt Parker. This time, here's a video that explains from the basics what kinds of numbers exist: ▶ this video

in “Famous Transcendental Numbers” · View on HN

globular-toastFeb 2025Cites it

I wonder if this was the inspiration for this numberphile video? ▶ this video The video does go further than the article.

in “The number line freaks me out (2016)” · View on HN

ccvannormanFeb 2025Cites it

corollary: Numberphile (with Matt Parker of Stand Up Maths) - "All the Numbers". Most are incomputable, of course :) [0] ▶ this video

in “What can be computed? A practical guide to the theory of computation (2018) [pdf]” · View on HN

ArnavionSep 2024Cites it

Such numbers are called "normal numbers". Pi likely is one based on all the digits we've computed for it, but we don't have any way to prove a given number like pi is normal or not. Relevant Numberphile video: ▶ this video

in “Memorizing the first 100 perfect squares (2022)” · View on HN

BeldinJan 2023Cites it

See also this Numberphile video on numbers, including algebraic, computable, transcendental, and talking about numbers beyond those. ▶ this video

in “An intutive counterexample to the axiom of choice” · View on HN

jerfAug 2019Cites it

It's worse than you make it sound, though: ▶ this video In short, it isn't just that we have more computables than non-computables; there are categories of numbers like "normal" that nominally contain "all the numbers" but we can barely even name a handful.

in “Calculus Is Deeply Irrational” · View on HN

Topics & tags

Recreational & visual mathPure mathematicsComputability & complexity theorytranscendental numbersnormal numberscomputabilitychaitin's constantmatt parker