APL demonstration 1975

Thanks for sharing. I worked on the UIUC campus for some time right by the greenhouses where they experimented with cultivars of corn and other grasses, always funny to see giant 8 foot tall plants lit with sodium lamps through the winter. As for APL, I haven't really got past an orientation in the language but it's held a total mystique to me since seeing this video circa 1975 [0] walking through the language with a Selectric teletype acting as a REPL, totally flipped my understanding of computer history, I assumed it was all punchcard programming back in the old black and white days xD (I am born 1990 for reference, trying to catch up with what happened before me) [0] (30min) ▶ this video

in “IBM unveils 127-qubit quantum processor” · View on HN

There is something so charming about the attached video [0]. It's very reminiscent of the original APL demonstration [1] from 1975. I love it! 0. [link] 1. ▶ this video

in “J can look like APL or English” · View on HN

I think the key to understanding APL is realizing that it’s not built for Programmers; it’s built for Mathematicians. Here’s a fine half-hour introduction to APL in action: ▶ this video 1:00-2:00 is the motivation for APL—or any DSL—in a nutshell. (“conversational computing”, “users who are [not] professional programmers”) Or, if you’re happy to sit back and see math magic happen: [link] For all its mechanical advances over the last 40 years, it’s shocking how far our technology has regressed philosophically.

in “A+, the Programming Language of Morgan Stanley” · View on HN

I think this is a good youtube video for someone starting from zero: ▶ this video An issue is how to enter the symbols. The way I do it is I created some input methods for Mac and Windows which use at-signs followed by the APL community name for the symbol: @times × @grade ⍋ @reverse ⌽ @domino ⌹ [link]

in “GNU APL 1.7 Released” · View on HN

APL without native fonts isn't fun at all. This is real fibonacci in APL: [link] [link] This is a nice introduction into APL: ▶ this video And this is how APL is applied in the right way: [link]

in “J for C Programmers” · View on HN

You have posted an amazing and comprehensive comment. > If you look at the symbol, it looks like a rectangle with a division symbol inside. If you skip exactly 20 minutes into this video it IS EXACTLY a rectangle with a division symbol inside: ▶ this video I don't know whether to think "thank goodness for unicode" or "unicode is an enabler of problematic practices" :)

in “Python should take a lesson from APL: Walrus operator not needed” · View on HN