Skip to content
HHackerTube.videoSurprise me

Brendan Eich: JavaScript, Firefox, Mozilla, and Brave | Lex Fridman Podcast #160

Brendan Eich: JavaScript, Firefox, Mozilla, and Brave | Lex Fridman Podcast #160 on HackerTube: recommended by 5 Hacker News commenters across 4 separate months, 2021–2023.

Lex Fridman

podcast · evergreen

Open on YouTube

A roughly three-hour Lex Fridman podcast conversation with Brendan Eich, creator of JavaScript and co-founder of Mozilla and Brave. It covers JavaScript's rushed creation at Netscape, the browser wars, Firefox and Mozilla, and Brave's privacy approach.

Why Hacker News recommends it

Linked as a source for first-hand JavaScript and Netscape history, with commenters pointing to specific segments like the Java versus JavaScript decision.

people recommended it
5
separate months
4
strong recommendations
1
discussed on HN
2021–2023
“a real gem of an interview, in my opinion”
— michaelsbradley, Jun 2021, in “Brave Search beta”

What HN commenters said

11 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.

michaelsbradleyJun 2021Strongly recommends

Lex Fridman interviewed Brendan Eich earlier this year (a real gem of an interview, in my opinion). I found all of it interesting, but here's a timecode link where they begin to discuss the current era of "browser wars", technical aspects and history of privacy protections, ads, search, and how that's all related. ▶ this video

in “Brave Search beta” · View on HN

hnrodeyJul 2023Recommends

If this is exciting for you then you'll love this podcast with Brendan Eich. Brendan Eich is the creator of JavaScript and co-founder of Mozilla and Brave. ▶ this video

in “Netscape and Sun announce JavaScript (1995)” · View on HN

pmurt7Mar 2021Recommends

There was this wonderful podcast featuring Eich a few days ago: "Brendan Eich: JavaScript, Firefox, Mozilla, and Brave" ▶ this video

in “Brave buys a search engine, promises no tracking, no profiling” · View on HN

jcimsFeb 2021Recommends

Lex Fridman just did a great podcast episode with Brendan Eich, credited with creating JavaScript. Lots of great little tidbits of history in the conversation - ▶ this video

in “Faster JavaScript Calls” · View on HN

onetomFeb 2021Recommends

Recommended "literature": 1. 10 Things I Regret About Node.js - Ryan Dahl - JSConf EU ( [link] ) 2. Brendan Eich: JavaScript, Firefox, Mozilla, and Brave | Lex Fridman Podcast #160 ( ▶ this video )

in “Choose Boring Technology (2015)” · View on HN

BrendanEichNov 2022Cites it

Scope in early JS was handled through a parent slot. Self was a big influence but I had no time to honor it properly. JS had ten days till a demo to prove to factions in Netscape and to most of Sun (Bill Joy was ally) that it had a role to play. See ▶ this video (earlier if you have time).

in “The influence of Self” · View on HN

Show 5 more comments
EMRZJan 2022Cites it

It was the battle for "the web" and the sun+netscape partnership was an actual menace to microsoft's activex and vbscript things. There is an espisode the Lex Fridman podcast with Brendan Eich where he talks a little about that specific time.[1] The "panic" was right imo (only in that specific area) i mean, there is almost 0 microsoft on the web today. [1]: ▶ this video

in ““I am literally losing sleep” over Java (1996)” · View on HN

BrendanEichJul 2021Cites it

Ten day Mocha had strict ==, so better in that regard. History is detailed at ▶ this video . Rather than assuming a too-simple version, check out the details for how things went down. Do-overs not possible, by better new forms over time helped. Honest q: Do you actually use modern JS at all?

in “How JavaScript Works: deep dive into call, apply, and bind” · View on HN

jasodeMar 2021Cites it

>If only the conversations between Sun and Netscape had gone a little differently back in the day, and we'd had a single language/system in the browser Brendan Eich said there were discussions with Sun (e.g. Bill Joy) and Marc Andreessen and all agreed[1] there should deliberately be 2 languages instead of 1 in the Netscape browser: (1) an "easier/simpler" scripting type of language LiveScript aka Javascript (2) a "professional" compiled type of language like Java for more complex applications So, it wasn't an accident, or case of NIH Not Invented Here, or corporate bickering. What they didn't foresee in 1994 is that the non-professional Javascript would end up adding more (pro) features that it enabled it to eliminate the need for Java Applets. [1] deep link to B.E. explanation: ▶ this video

in “The End of Applets” · View on HN

11235813213455Mar 2021Cites it

similarly to your experience, I'm using Brave browser (based on chromium) since recently (after watching ▶ this video ), mostly attracted by the built-in adblocker

in “AskHN: How much is Chrome and how much is Chromium?” · View on HN

BrendanEichFeb 2021Cites it

Hyatt anecdote at ▶ this video . The point is not about Silicon Valley, commercialization of the Web (although as Dorothy Denning observed, the pre-Web Academic Internet was a more secure world only because not many attackers yet), or academic pressure. WiB applies to biology. I have friends at a synth-bio startup, one tweeted humorously the other month about how bad a hack evolution is!

in “Brendan Eich on the Lex Fridman Podcast [video]” · View on HN

Topics & tags