Can we build AI without losing control over it? | Sam Harris

I don't think many people are worried that what we have now is a major risk. The major concern is the implications of the trajectory we are now on. If you look at what ChatGPT and Midjourney and the like can do now compared to just a couple of years ago, it's pretty incredible. If you extrapolate the next few similar jumps in capability, and assume that won't be 20 years away, then what AI is going to be capable of before even my kids leave college is going to be mind-boggling, and in some possible futures not in a good way. I remember seeing this talk from Sam Harris nearly 6 years ago and it logically making a lot of sense back then ( ▶ this video ). The past couple of years have made this all the more prescient. (Worth a watch if you have 15 mins).

in “Douglas Hofstadter changes his mind on Deep Learning and AI risk” · View on HN

This made me think about Sam Harris's comparison between ourselves and John Van Neumann as analogous to a comparison between a chicken and ourselves. [1] ▶ this video

in “Questions about the hard limits of human intelligence” · View on HN

Even people giving TED talks about the threat of AI are unable to marshal an appropriate emotional response to the dangers that lie ahead: ▶ this video

in “There's No Fire Alarm for Artificial General Intelligence” · View on HN