Skip to content
HHackerTube.videoSurprise me

David Kriesel: Lies, damned lies and scans

David Kriesel: Lies, damned lies and scans on HackerTube: recommended by 2 Hacker News commenters across 2 separate months, 2020–2026.

Free and Open Source Software Conference (FrOSCon) e.V.

talk · intermediate · evergreen

Open on YouTube

David Kriesel's FrOSCon talk on how Xerox scancopiers, due to JBIG2 compression, silently replaced digits in scanned documents. He walks through how he discovered the bug and why it is so dangerous.

Why Hacker News recommends it

The standard reference whenever HN discusses the Xerox scanner bug or AI and compression that fabricates content.

people recommended it
2
separate months
2
strong recommendations
0
discussed on HN
2020–2026
“There a few videos of David Kriesel explaining the bug for the curious”
— bXVsbGVy, Aug 2020, in “PDF: Still unfit for human consumption, 20 years later”

What HN commenters said

5 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.

lynx23Jun 2023Recommends

Even though this happened a long time ago, whenever I hear or think about it, I am a mazed that it didn't put Xerox out of business, or at least hurt a little more. After all, some big players were already doing digital archiving at the time. :-/ BTW, the CCC had a pretty neat presentation at that time as well: ▶ this video

in “” · View on HN

bXVsbGVyAug 2020Recommends

> You may remember that this played a strange role in Obama's birth certificate some years back Just to clarify, the issue with the compression algorithm used by the scanner, not with the PDF format itself. There a few videos of David Kriesel explaining the bug for the curious: ▶ this video

in “PDF: Still unfit for human consumption, 20 years later” · View on HN

Terr_Mar 2026Cites it

> OCR for construction documents does not work I'm reminded of the Xerox JBIG2 bug back in ~2013, where certain scan settings could silently replace numbers inside documents, and bad construction-plans were one of the cases that led to it being discovered. [0] It wasn't overt OCR per se , users weren't trying to convert pixels to characters. [0] ▶ this video

in “OCR For construction documents does not work, we fixed it” · View on HN

maxnoeNov 2021Cites it

There is a version with an English voice over of the original talk here: [link] And the talk he gave in English himself here: ▶ this video

in “Confused Xerox copiers rewrite scanned documents, expert finds (2013)” · View on HN

dorgoMar 2021Cites it

Sounds like the next iteration of "Lies, damned lies and scans": ▶ this video >On the scale of things too horrible to contemplate, "document-altering scanner" is right up there with "flesh-eating bacteria". Since 2006, Xerox scancopiers literally are making stuff up. They, for example, replace digits with others in scans.

in “Adobe Photoshop's 'super resolution' made my jaw hit the floor” · View on HN

Topics & tags

Information theory & signal processingSoftware (other)Security & hackingxeroxjbig2image compressiondata corruptiondavid kriesel