Skip to content
HHackerTube.videoSurprise me

Flash Mob Gone Wrong | Tom Scott | Ignite

Flash Mob Gone Wrong | Tom Scott | Ignite on HackerTube: recommended by 1 Hacker News commenter across 1 month, 2012–2020.

Ignite Talks - Smart Ideas From Around the World

talk · evergreen

Open on YouTube

Tom Scott's Ignite London talk about a flash mob that went very wrong.

Why Hacker News recommends it

Recommended as an excellent short Ignite talk from a geek comedian.

people recommended it
1
separate months
1
strong recommendations
0
discussed on HN
2012–2020
“You might enjoy this excellent video of his talk at Ignite a few years back”
— swombat, May 2013, in “Lies on the London Underground [video]”

What HN commenters said

3 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.

swombatMay 2013Recommends

You seem unreasonably grumpy... take a breath, chill out. I enjoyed the video and upvoted it - as did many others, clearly. It's of interest to hackers. Tom Scott is also "one of us" - a geek comedian. Probably one of the reasons why others have been upvoting this. You might enjoy this excellent video of his talk at Ignite a few years back: ▶ this video

in “Lies on the London Underground [video]” · View on HN

theoriqueSep 2012Cites it

These are some interesting points. You're absolutely right that the anonymous and distributed nature of 4chan means that the "/b/" entity can react to perceived slights (trolling, mockery) in a radically disproportionate way. If the individual provoker annoys /b/ with "strength" 1, and (e.g.) 10 000 /b/ denizens are each sufficiently annoyed to push back at the provoker with equal "strength" 1, that means that the reaction to the individual is profoundly out of proportion to the original attack. By a factor of thousands. It's like burning someone's house down with their family inside because they dented your bumper without leaving a note. But as you point out, few individuals were all that nasty - the culpability is distributed across a large, anonymous mob, with a few critical nodes, such as those persons who leaked the individual's contact information, or made prank phone calls to her work place. The crowd / mob dynamics gives massive strength to the anonymous group that is absolutely unmatched by the individual. Mob dynamics in physical space are understood well enough, and police have had various means of dealing with large groups of disorganized people in town squares and so forth. This is not the case for internet-distributed mobs, which are still relatively new. The process is like leaderless, decentralized, crowdsourcing of cruelty (cf. "Anonymous: because none of us is as cruel as all of us"). And of course, the greater the crowd, the greater the possibility of someo

in “What Happens When You Taunt 4Chan: Story of Lacey Vicich ” · View on HN

jcahillJul 2020Critical

I'm similarly unclear on what sort of response you expect. There weren't many comments when I replied. My criticism was tailored to a fairly specific phenomenon: asymmetrically imaginative doomsaying that appeals to a vivid vignette / sketch of an adjacent possible future featuring some hyperbolically elaborated extension of trending tech, like Flash Mob Gone Wrong[1] and Slaughterbots[2]. HN flagging and points are irrelevant to me. ____________________ [1]: ▶ this video [2]: [link]

in “Yoloface-500k: ultra-light real-time face detection model, 500kb” · View on HN

Topics & tags