Agreed, Chandler from Google makes the good case here for Clang. Chandler Carruth - Clang: Defending C++ from Murphy's Million Monkeys GoingNative 2012 - Day 2 - Clang ▶ this video
in “Compiler Errors for Humans” · View on HN
GoingNative 2012 - Day 2 - Clang on HackerTube: recommended by 1 Hacker News commenter across 1 month, 2015–2022.
talk · intermediate · dated
Chandler Carruth's GoingNative 2012 talk on Clang, covering how the compiler helps defend C++ code from mistakes. It makes the case for Clang's diagnostics and tooling.
Cited in discussions of why Clang exists and its case against GCC.
“Chandler from Google makes the good case here for Clang.”
3 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.
Agreed, Chandler from Google makes the good case here for Clang. Chandler Carruth - Clang: Defending C++ from Murphy's Million Monkeys GoingNative 2012 - Day 2 - Clang ▶ this video
in “Compiler Errors for Humans” · View on HN
Related, the reason why Clang was created is because GCC was specifically made to prevent it from being used with non-free software. You can find that quote around 3:17 of this talk: ▶ this video It turned out to be easier in the long run to write a compiler from scratch, than to work with GCC.
in “Richard Stallman – The state of the Free Software movement” · View on HN
> both clang and GCC are viable bases from which you make your internal tooling. License is not the only factor determining usability of a compiler wrt interfacing with external tools. GCC was deliberately designed to prevent such usage. See ▶ this video at 2:22 for a direct quote from RMS on this topic.
in “Using Clang on Windows” · View on HN