Intel - Anti-Competitive, Anti-Consumer, Anti-Technology. on HackerTube: recommended by 3 Hacker News commenters across 3 separate months, 2017–2023.
commentary · dated
AdoredTV's history of Intel's monopolistic behavior over three decades, covering its dealings with AMD and its anti-consumer practices.
Recommended as an overview of Intel's anti-competitive past and why it kept dominating despite AMD's competitive products.
“This is a very good overview of bad anti-consumer practices Intel has done throughout the last 30 years”
6 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.
I'm not sure what you mean. From the time AMD released the K7 'Athlon' CPU, until the time Intel released Core2, AMD was king of performance. That's a long spawn of time. To understand why Intel kept selling CPUs like pancakes despite this, check this out: ▶ this video
in “AMD's Stock Price Jumps on News of Earnings Spurred by Ryzen” · View on HN
This is a very good overview of bad anti-consumer practices Intel has done throughout the last 30 years: ▶ this video
in “The Huge Premium Intel Is Charging for Skylake Xeons” · View on HN
I watched this video yesterday, and it seems to explain a lot about how Intel has been less focused on building better technology in the last 10-15 years: ▶ this video I'm not sure how balanced the viewpoint in the video is, but the author comes up with a lot of references.
in “Samsung ends Intel's 2-decade-plus reign in microchips” · View on HN
I'd still just buy the AMD gpu. Mature drivers, and better tested alongside AMD cpus. Also, I never liked Intel[0]. 0. ▶ this video
in “Watch out AMD: Intel Arc A580 could be the next great affordable GPU” · View on HN
>AMD failed to capture the market despite making tremendous gains and legitimizing itself. Because Intel played dirty and illegal[0]. [0]: ▶ this video
in “AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is the fastest processor on Geekbench” · View on HN
I assume you mean Linus from YouTubes "Linus Tech Tips", and not Linus Torvalds. Surprised you wouldn't clarify that considering what website this is. Considering Intel's history, I wouldn't bet they direct their efforts based on a YouTube reviewer. Also, considering Intels very anti-competitive behavior (e.g [0], [1], [2]), I am wary of stating Intel entering the DDR industry will make it any less corrupt. [0]: [link] [1]: [link] [2]: ▶ this video
in “Intel Announces Optane DIMMs” · View on HN