Skip to content
HHackerTube.videoSurprise me

Intelligence is not Enough | Bryan Cantrill | Monktoberfest 2023

Intelligence is not Enough | Bryan Cantrill | Monktoberfest 2023 on HackerTube: recommended by 1 Hacker News commenter across 1 month, 2023–2025.

Bryan Cantrill's Monktoberfest 2023 talk takes on AI doomerism, weighing the theoretical existential risks against the reality on the ground. He takes a skeptical but thoughtful view of how to balance AI's potential against its risks.

Why Hacker News recommends it

Recommended as a thoughtful Cantrill talk on embracing failure and curiosity in engineering, and as a skeptical counterpoint to AI doom narratives.

people recommended it
1
separate months
1
strong recommendations
0
discussed on HN
2023–2025
“I saw Bryan Cantrill's talk on [Intelligence is Not Enough][0]”
— tegiddrone, Apr 2024, in “Mental health in software engineering”

What HN commenters said

3 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.

tegiddroneApr 2024Recommends

I saw Bryan Cantrill's talk on [Intelligence is Not Enough][0] opposing some opinions on AI/ML is gonna do to the industry... but I felt like it touches on some ideas that can relate the topic of mental health as well. Many software shops/enterprises don't value the necessity of embracing failure and making space for curiosity . That's fine, but then these shops should be strict about using Boring Technology they can just buy support for. If such companies have too much product ambition in the mix, then you need to give devs the ability to be engineers by giving them space to fail, try new things, refactor, rewrite. We can't do that when the pressure is on to ship in unsustainable ways! Failure is not an option. We spent all that money writing that MVP, what do you mean you need a team to just maintain it? We have features to build!! Not everyone is competitive enough to work with excellent engineering culture and we trade mental health in for it sometimes. [0]: ▶ this video

in “Mental health in software engineering” · View on HN

bcantrillFeb 2025Cites it

I am glad to see that many people are being correcting you, but just to put a sharp point on it: I am using that metaphor to condemn Ellison, not to condone or accept him. Unfortunately, since that talk in 2011, what was an aberration (albeit a broadly unspoken one) has since -- tragically -- become the norm. I refuse to accept this, however: I will continue to speak my truth about the moral decay in tech, and why we must hold ourselves to a higher standard.[0][1][2][3][4] And I obviously agree with your indignation that poor corporate behavior should not be the status quo! [0] Principles of Technology Leadership , [link] (2017) [1] Andreessen's Corollary: Ethical Dilemmas in Software Engineering , [link] (2019) [2] (Anti-)application Video for YC120 , [link] (2019) [3] Coming Of Age , [link] (2022) [4] Intelligence is not Enough , ▶ this video (2023)

in “Oracle justified its JavaScript trademark with Node.js–now it wants that ignored” · View on HN

pasNov 2023Cites it

the strong needs to just take whatever it wants, and so be it? there's no separating technology from context, as in consequences. yes, all the talk about bombing datacenters is crazy, but oversight is not. ▶ this video

in “Sam Altman Exposes the Charade of AI Accountability” · View on HN

Topics & tags

AI safety, AGI & impactTech pioneers & interviewsaidoomerismbryan cantrillengineering cultureskepticism