Joe Rogan Experience #1191 - Peter Boghossian & James Lindsay on HackerTube: recommended by 2 Hacker News commenters across 2 separate months, 2018–2019.
podcast · dated
Joe Rogan interviews Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay, who describe their hoax papers submitted to academic journals in grievance studies. The conversation runs about two hours and covers academic publishing, ideology and victimhood culture.
HN commenters recommend it as an entertaining account of how easily fake papers get published and of problems in academic peer review.
“If you have not watched Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay on the Joe Rogan show you should.”
5 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.
If you have not watched Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay on the Joe Rogan show you should. Very entertaining and shows how ridiculous these publications are. ▶ this video
in “Science Vigilante Calls Out Bogus Results in Prestigious Journals” · View on HN
The term "competitive victimhood" came to my attention after watching the Joe Rogan interview of Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay who pranked academic journals with research papers based on ridiculous premises. A must watch IMO ▶ this video
in “Jussie Smollett Story Shows Rise of Victimhood Culture” · View on HN
> But does that justify what they did? Yes, it does. These journals are an absolute joke, make a mockery of any serious attempt to advance knowledge and understanding, and deserve to be pilloried. Their standards of rigour and review are shockingly poor and as such they do not provide a suitable vehicle for the publication of genuine research, or for measured consideration of the content they do publish. Just this week I ran across this, where a couple of the academics concerned were interviewed by Joe Rogan late last year: ▶ this video Fascinating, horrifying, and entertaining in equal measure. For more background, there's also this on wikipedia: [link]
in “We need to talk about systematic fraud” · View on HN
> Absolutely terrifying. Indeed. We seem to be increasingly awash with evidence that the standards of rigour in academic journals across a number of fields are... quite poor. Peter Boghossian, James Lindsay and Helen Pluckrose set out to demonstrate this in the field of grievance studies by submitting and, in some cases, successfully publishing a series of fake papers: ▶ this video I mean, in some sense this is highly entertaining for the rest of us, but it is also utterly horrifying.
in “Much of the “science” used in design is bullshit (2014)” · View on HN
It's a 3 page document that makes a number of false assumptions. They extrapolate bitcoin to having 300 billion transactions and means no lightening or L2 solution and the block size would be 3gigs. Nor do they even factor in the halving. Wasn't even researched properly, just utter nonsense for the papers. And Joe Rogan was showing how easy it is to publish fake papers in journals. ▶ this video here is the paper by the way behind a shitty paywall. [link]
in “Bitcoin emissions alone could push global warming above 2°C [pdf]” · View on HN