Skip to content
HHackerTube.videoSurprise me

LSTM is dead. Long Live Transformers!

LSTM is dead. Long Live Transformers! on HackerTube: recommended by 4 Hacker News commenters across 4 separate months, 2020–2023.

Seattle Applied Deep Learning

lecture · intermediate · evergreen

Open on YouTube

Leo Dirac explains how transformer models have replaced LSTMs in NLP. He gives background from bag of words through RNNs and LSTMs, then a technical deep dive into multi-headed self-attention and positional encoding, with sample code.

Why Hacker News recommends it

Recommended as a clear explanation of why RNNs fall short and how transformers solve it.

people recommended it
4
separate months
4
strong recommendations
1
discussed on HN
2020–2023
“has gotten tons of compliments and keeps people watching year after year”
— leopd, May 2023, in “Ask HN: Can someone ELI5 Transformers and the “Attention is all we need” paper”

What HN commenters said

5 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.

leopdMay 2023Strongly recommends

I don't think you really want a 5yo's version, because that's "computers can be smart". But for an SDE1-level explanation I made this video which has gotten tons of compliments and keeps people watching year after year: ▶ this video It's in the context of NLP, which is where transformers started of course.

in “Ask HN: Can someone ELI5 Transformers and the “Attention is all we need” paper” · View on HN

qigtyofhpFeb 2023Recommends

The attention mechanism started as a simple trick to not use recurrent neural networks. Read the intro in the original paper "Attention is all you need paper" ( [link] ) This video explains the drawbacks to RNNs and how transformers solve that: ▶ this video Andrej Karpathy explains attention here: [link] He explains how attention is seen as a communication network: [link]

in “Understanding and Coding the Self-Attention Mechanism of Large Language Models” · View on HN

peterfireflyJan 2023Recommends

Yannic Kilcher is great but this video worked better for me: "LSTM is dead. Long live transformers!" (Leo Dirac): ▶ this video

in “The Transformer Family” · View on HN

FL33TW00DOct 2020Recommends

I've just recently been on a journey to understand transformers in and out, here are the resources I've found managed to drill it into my head: 1. Chapters 7, 9, 10 [link] This was really useful to really build up to the concepts of attention (although the actual attention section is still brief). 2. [link] This was great for visualization and understanding that attention wasn't exclusively for transformers and actually was for RNNs first. 3. [link] Getting to understand how transformers actually work visually. 4. ▶ this video This lecture by Leo Dirac was extremely helpful to finish off with, not only because it actually includes some pseudocode but it also revisits some key topics and covers why transformers are needed. One of the big confusion points for me was that the concept of ATTENTION and SELF-ATTENTION are not the same thing. Hope this helps.

in “Rethinking Attention with Performers” · View on HN

abetuskApr 2023Cites it

I'm not sure I understand it well enough to say but watching a video on it [0] I think there were a few key points: * "Attention is all you need" introduced positional encoding which allows you to keep context of the word, allowing for more complex translation (and thus generative/chatgpt like tasks?) because words now have context relative to each other. Contrast this with "bag of words" models that only tells you whether the word is present or not. * I don't quite understand why but transformers (which "AiaYN" introduced) can be made fully parallel, compared with the RNN/LSTM networks which has to be serial per token. Fully parallel allows for GPU optimization, which means you can take advantage of Moore's law for training. I'm always a bit suspicious when people claim a breakthrough of this sort. There's no doubt that better algorithms give better results but how much is due to just faster computers, cheaper compute, memory, etc. [0] ▶ this video

in “We aren't close to creating a rapidly self-improving AI” · View on HN

Topics & tags