Skip to content
HHackerTube.videoSurprise me

May 1, 1969: Fred Rogers testifies before the Senate Subcommittee on Communications

May 1, 1969: Fred Rogers testifies before the Senate Subcommittee on Communications on HackerTube: recommended by 9 Hacker News commenters across 8 separate months, 2015–2026.

Road Less Marveled

other · evergreen

Open on YouTube

Seven-minute footage of Fred Rogers testifying before a US Senate subcommittee in 1969 to defend federal funding for the new Corporation for Public Broadcasting. A skeptical Senator Pastore starts out abrasive and is won over during Rogers' brief, calm testimony.

Why Hacker News recommends it

HN commenters hold it up as a model of persuasive public speaking and as the go-to reminder of why public broadcasting deserves funding.

people recommended it
9
separate months
8
strong recommendations
3
discussed on HN
2015–2026
“Fred Rogers' 1969 testimony before the Senate in defense of PBS funding is very moving.”
— kingbirdy, Dec 2019, in “Caroll Spinney has died”

What HN commenters said

14 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.

chimeracoderJan 2024Strongly recommends

> Doesn't look like he recorded much (outside the show), but definitely will be looking into what he has recorded. For anyone who hasn't seen it, one must-see video outside the show is Fred Rogers testifying before the Senate in 1969, in order to defend funding for public television. He is able to win over an incredibly rude and hostile senator in just a few minutes. ▶ this video

in “Mr. Rogers' music was intricate (2020) [video]” · View on HN

kingbirdyDec 2019Strongly recommends

If you haven't seen it before, Fred Rogers' 1969 testimony before the Senate in defense of PBS funding is very moving. He was able to prevent a $10M cut to their $20M funding. ▶ this video

in “Caroll Spinney has died” · View on HN

selljamhereJun 2018Strongly recommends

One of my favorite examples of public speaking is Mr. Rogers testifying before a Senate subcommittee in support of funding for national public television. He is calm, thoughtful and thorough through the entire process, speaking simply and without grandeur. It's a small wonder he found such success, and a great example of the importance of clear communication. ▶ this video

in “Mr. Rogers Had a Simple Set of Rules for Talking to Children” · View on HN

adfmDec 2025Recommends

I offer Fred Rogers testifying before the senate subcommittee on communications as a refresher on why we must continue to fund PBS and NPR. ▶ this video The person on the other end of that call is thin skinned and likely not hugged much as a child. Sad.

in “After NPR and PBS defunding, FCC receives call to take away station licenses” · View on HN

alickzSep 2021Recommends

As a European I never grew up with Mister Rogers, but his testimony to the Senate Subcommittee on Communications is very impressive to me. ▶ this video

in “Mister Rogers had a simple set of rules for talking to children (2018)” · View on HN

yoshamanoSep 2018Recommends

There was a documentary about him released this year I highly recommend called Won't You Be My Neighbor. [link] As far as examples, here's an episode about divorce that I remember helping me deal with my parents' divorce when I was little. [link] Or here's his speech to Congress fighting for funding for public television (it's more complicated than just funding for public television, but that's the basic idea). ▶ this video Or one of my favorites, his acceptance speech for his lifetime achievement Emmy Award. [link]

in “Mr. Rogers vs. the Superheroes” · View on HN

Show 8 more comments
disqardJul 2018Recommends

That's very well articulated. He had no pretense and never came across as patronizing, at least in my (admittedly limited) sampling of old episodes via YouTube. The "take others for exactly who they are" mentality captures his earnestness and utter lack of guile in his interactions. I'm sure you've seen him testify before the Senate Subcommittee on Communications to maintain funding for PBS [0], but I'll leave this link here anyway, for others who might not have seen this. [0] ▶ this video

in “The Fred Rogers We Know” · View on HN

extralegoJul 2018Recommends

Incase anyone hasn’t seen this video of him presenting before the senate committee in 1969, in support of national public television. ▶ this video

in “Mr. Rogers was my actual neighbor” · View on HN

hitekkerDec 2015Recommends

> Mister Rogers For those who didn't grow up with Mister Rogers, I encourage you to watch this, ▶ this video , to get a sense of how effective he was as a speaker.

in “How Elmo Ruined Sesame Street” · View on HN

raw_anon_1111Apr 2026Cites it

So exactly when was the US a “good democracy”? 80 years ago segregation was still in the South based on a ruling by the Supreme Court “separate but equal”. Even until the 80s it was legal to arrest a homosexual couple for having sex in their own home based on “sodomy” laws. Today women are dying because doctors are afraid of performing medical necessary abortions to save their lives because they might go to jail They have been trying to get rid of funding since at least 1969 when Mr. Rogers himself went before Congress to try to keep it. ▶ this video It amazes me that anyone who knows anything about this country actually wants to give it more control of the media or any increased power .

in “Apple App Store threatened to remove Grok over deepfakes: Letter” · View on HN

gjvcJan 2024Cites it

for children who had the television as a babysitter and that's the difference, as I think he explains in his statement to the Senate Subcommitte on Communications in 1969 ▶ this video

in “Mr. Rogers' music was intricate (2020) [video]” · View on HN

btillyJul 2022Cites it

In other words, he spoke to children as if they are inexperienced humans. No, he spoke to them in the way he spoke to all humans. For example here he is talking to Congress: ▶ this video

in “Mr. Rogers sued the KKK (2021)” · View on HN

s5300Oct 2020Cites it

No. They don't. As a matter of fact, the U.S. (of which I'm a citizen) has a singular entity to thank for the fact PBS is here today. ▶ this video And, to add some insult, one of our two leading political parties is currently making fun of that entity. Things are great over here.

in “A conversation with Shel Kaphan, Amazon’s first employee (2016)” · View on HN

DonHopkinsJun 2018Cites it

I agree 100% with Berkeley Breathed when he wrote: Mister Rogers: Welcome to my neighborhood, boys and girls! Did you enjoy meeting Senator Kravitz today? I did. He told us about something called "inflation," didn't he? Can YOU say "inflation?" Opus: Inphlabph. Mister Rogers: Good! Can you say "Mister Rogers should be paid more dough?" Opus: Mister Rogers should - Mister Rogers: Can you put it on a postcard? [link] I believe that was a Soupy Sales reference: [link] [link] Here is Mister Rogers talking to the children in Congress, successfully asking them to send him millions of little green pieces of paper: ▶ this video

in “Mr. Rogers Had a Simple Set of Rules for Talking to Children” · View on HN

Topics & tags

US politics & electionsMedia, journalism & propagandafred rogerssenate testimonypbspublic speakingchildren's television