Skip to content
HHackerTube.videoSurprise me

MINIX 3: a Modular, Self-Healing POSIX-compatible Operating System

MINIX 3: a Modular, Self-Healing POSIX-compatible Operating System on HackerTube: recommended by 4 Hacker News commenters across 4 separate months, 2013–2023.

FOSDEM

talk · intermediate · evergreen

Open on YouTube

Andrew Tanenbaum's FOSDEM 2010 talk on MINIX 3, a microkernel OS built for high reliability and security. It shows how the system detects and recovers from device driver crashes, and addresses microkernel performance concerns.

Why Hacker News recommends it

HN points to it as an accessible explanation of microkernel isolation and fault-tolerant design, and as Tanenbaum's answer to performance objections.

people recommended it
4
separate months
4
strong recommendations
1
discussed on HN
2013–2023
“it's a very interesting but accessible talk for those interested in lower-level systems and fault-tolerant architectures.”
— TallGuyShort, Apr 2013, in “Ask HN: What's the best technical talk you've heard?”

What HN commenters said

6 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.

TallGuyShortApr 2013Strongly recommends

Andrew Tanenbaum presenting on Minix 3's architecture: ▶ this video . Regardless of one's opinions on microkernels vs. monolithic kernels, it's a very interesting but accessible talk for those interested in lower-level systems and fault-tolerant architectures.

in “Ask HN: What's the best technical talk you've heard?” · View on HN

shangxiaoNov 2014Recommends

Writing OS's is hard and there are no shortcuts. You should take a look at microkernels and the work Andrew Tanenbaum did with Minix 3 [1] and his modular design as this is the sort of direction you're probably looking for with customisable OS's. [1] ▶ this video

in “Hobby kernel and userspace, built mostly from scratch” · View on HN

noblethrasherJun 2014Recommends

Here's Andy Tannenbaum's response to the performance issues of microkernels: ▶ this video (should start at about 47:15)

in “What are the advantages of the Hurd over Linux/BSD? (2013)” · View on HN

thirstehFeb 2013Recommends

It's also for security. If you find a security vulnerability in e.g. the sound driver, you're not going to get root access. Andrew Tanenbaum explains it well: ▶ this video

in “Minix 3.2.1 Released” · View on HN

nickpsecurityFeb 2023Cites it

Here's you some examples to learn from. Most are old enough that patents have expired: Why Do Computers Stop and What Can Be Done About It? (1985) [link] Their NonStop Architecture [link] QNX's systems are ultra-reliable, too [link] OpenVMS clusters' uptime was years to decades & mixed CPU ISA's [link] Systems that run forever and self-heal (Armstrong) [link] Microreboots [link] Minix 3: Microkernel-based, self-healing, POSIX OS ▶ this video

in “Ask HN: Best practices for self-healing apps?” · View on HN

carussellSep 2017Cites it

(2015) Previously: [link] And see [1], my note about this talk being more or less the same as the 2010 Minix talk at FOSDEM[2]. If you saw that one, or any other talk by Tanenbaum of that period, I'll spoil it for you: there's nothing substantially different in this talk. 1. [link] 2. ▶ this video

in “A reimplementation of NetBSD using a MicroKernel (2015)” · View on HN

Topics & tags

Operating systems & kernelsDistributed systemsminix 3microkernelfault tolerancetanenbaumself-healing