Skip to content
HHackerTube.videoSurprise me

Overview of Illumina Sequencing by Synthesis Workflow | Standard SBS chemistry

Overview of Illumina Sequencing by Synthesis Workflow | Standard SBS chemistry on HackerTube: recommended by 1 Hacker News commenter across 1 month, 2017–2019.

Illumina

explainer · intro · dated

Open on YouTube

Illumina's 3D animation of its sequencing-by-synthesis workflow, from sample preparation and cluster generation to sequencing on a flow cell and data analysis.

Why Hacker News recommends it

Commenters call it the best visualization of how the most common DNA sequencers work, though it predates newer chemistry.

people recommended it
1
separate months
1
strong recommendations
0
discussed on HN
2017–2019
“is the best visualization of how the most popular type of DNA sequencer works (that I've found)”
— shpx, Oct 2017, in “No human genome has ever been completely sequenced”

What HN commenters said

3 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.

shpxOct 2017Recommends

▶ this video is the best visualization of how the most popular type of DNA sequencer works (that I've found). Imagine you have a string of length 3 billion made by randomly choosing from 4 characters. Like this dna = ''.join(random.choices('atgc', weights=[30.9, 29.4, 19.9, 19.8], k=3_234_830_000)) you get to randomly sample 1 billion[3, page 7] overlapping substrings of length 200[3, page 7] with .1% of the characters randomly changed[3, page 8]. Trying to find the original string from this is technically an undecidable problem. If there's a sequence 400 characters long that repeats multiple times, how could you know if it repeats 5 times or 50 times? (this would be unlikely to happen with random.choices() but DNA isn't random). This is called sequence alignment and it's one of the hard problems in bioinformatics[4]. [0] [link] random.choices() was added in Python 3.6 [1] [link] source for `weights` [2] [link] source for 3_234_830_000 (python ignores underscores in numbers) [3] [link] illumina is the most popular producer of genome sequencers [4] [link]

in “No human genome has ever been completely sequenced” · View on HN

lkirkSep 2019Cites it

A sequencing run (at least in the context of Illumina's technology) requires a few very expensive consumable reagents: First being the flowcell (microscope slide that the dna sticks to while being read by a laser), the reagents (containing enzymes with fluorophores and other reagents for amplifying and manipulating DNA), and the actual power consumed by such machinery. This does not factor in prep/lab costs (which can be kept at a minimum with automation, but that also is a high startup cost endeavor). Each sequencing run can take ~1-3 days depending on the format. Edit: this video may be able to explain a little better how this process works: ▶ this video

in “DNA Data Storage: The Entirety of YouTube Could Fit on a Teaspoon” · View on HN

epistasisMay 2019Cites it

That video describes the process used before NGS was around. These days, using anything with plasmids would be pretty unusual. There are several next generation sequencing technologies: 1) short read - Illumina - dominates most next-generation sequencing 2) long read - nanopore or pacbio. These have very different analysis methods, have measurement errors that are very different, and even have different file formats, etc. Short read is far more common, so you're probably in the "Data Analysis" of this: ▶ this video But you need to know about the adapters and indices (how multiple samples can be sequenced at the same time). But as another commenter mentions, knowing some particulars about the project would really help know what sort of tutorial would be appropriate. You'll need to also know about the biology of the application, in addition to understanding the sequencing technology.

in “Genomics – A programmer’s guide” · View on HN

Topics & tags

Biology & biotechnologyEvolution & geneticsilluminasequencing by synthesisgenomicsflow cellngs