Skip to content
HHackerTube.videoSurprise me

Peter Norvig - The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data

Peter Norvig - The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data on HackerTube: recommended by 3 Hacker News commenters across 3 separate months, 2012–2026.

UBC Computer Science

lecture · intermediate · evergreen

Open on YouTube

Peter Norvig's UBC distinguished lecture on how massive amounts of simple data, such as for language modeling, can yield understanding that hand-built models could not.

Why Hacker News recommends it

Recommended as a favorite tech talk showing how huge data availability changes how problems are approached.

people recommended it
3
separate months
3
strong recommendations
1
discussed on HN
2012–2026
“Norvig does an especially great job in making you truly appreciate the seismic impact that the availability of massive quantities of data can have”
— ChicagoBoy11, Oct 2016, in “Ask HN: What's your favorite tech talk?”

What HN commenters said

5 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.

ChicagoBoy11Oct 2016Strongly recommends

Peter Norvig on the "Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data" ▶ this video I think it is so easy for us to discuss the impact of big data and quickly get into the weeds, but I think in this talk Norvig does an especially great job in making you truly appreciate the seismic impact that the availability of massive quantities of data can have on your way to think about problems. This is one of the first things I ever saw of him, and I've been in love ever since.

in “Ask HN: What's your favorite tech talk?” · View on HN

gpczJan 2013Recommends

If you're looking for more examples and information about using simple algorithms with lots of data, I recommend Peter Norvig's "The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data": ▶ this video

in “Data trumps everything” · View on HN

stiffMay 2012Recommends

I am not sure if I disagree with the central thesis of the article, but the argumentation seems rather weak in many places, for example he says: Let's take the example of the number of people who walk into a store and buy a certain product. By studying 10 customers you can get an estimate of the probability of the purchase and predict sales; by studying 100 customers you get a better estimate. By analyzing 1000 customers you have a very good estimate. You could study a million customers, but the results are unlikely to be vastly different from the results of analyzing 1000 customers and probably not worth the expense. This makes sense only for very low-dimensional data sets, but most real-life problems are very high-dimensional and in high-dimensional spaces a million customers (or any other number of samples you might reasonably expect to gather) might still very well be only a small sample. So, there are situations where because of various constraints you will never be able to get to this level where more data stops yielding better results. You can watch a nice presentation from Peter Norvig about the unreasonable effectiveness of data: ▶ this video Or read about the well-known curse of dimensionality: [link]

in “Beware The Hype Over Big Data Analytics” · View on HN

DonHopkinsFeb 2026Cites it

That happens often with domain names, but then you get expertsexchange.com, penisland.net, whorepresents.com, therapistfinder.com, a Dutch pre-match analysis site voorspel.nl, or a site about the game overspel.nl. Peter Norvig - The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data ▶ this video

in “Half million 'Words with Spaces' missing from dictionaries” · View on HN

wslhNov 2015Cites it

This is old news: Peter Norvig, The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data (2011): ▶ this video and a previous article from 2009: [link]

in “Google Open-Sourcing TensorFlow Shows AI's Future Is Data, Not Code” · View on HN

Topics & tags