Skip to content
HHackerTube.videoSurprise me

Soyuz Launch Escape Tower System

Soyuz Launch Escape Tower System on HackerTube: recommended by 1 Hacker News commenter across 2 separate months, 2011–2018.

Bruno Leal

news · evergreen

Open on YouTube

Short footage of the 1983 Soyuz T-10-1 pad fire, in which the launch escape tower pulled the crew away seconds before the rocket exploded.

Why Hacker News recommends it

HN cites it as the one dramatic real-world proof that a launch escape system works.

people recommended it
1
separate months
2
strong recommendations
1
discussed on HN
2011–2018
“here is a neat video of a launch escape system working as intended during Soyuz T-10-1”
— jlgreco, Oct 2012, in “Mercury-Redstone 1 - The four inch flight”

What HN commenters said

4 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.

jlgrecoAug 2012Strongly recommends

The video of T-10-1 is stunning: ▶ this video That the people on that rocket escaped with "bruises" is amazing.

in “How We Nearly Lost the Discovery Shuttle” · View on HN

jlgrecoOct 2012Recommends

For those interested, here is a neat video of a launch escape system working as intended during Soyuz T-10-1: ▶ this video It is the only time a launch escape system has actually been used.

in “Mercury-Redstone 1 - The four inch flight” · View on HN

dvdkhlngMay 2018Cites it

Related video: Video of Soyuz launch escape system used in a real emergency: ▶ this video This is probably how SpaceX imagines astronauts would be saved in case of a fueling problem.

in “NASA advisers say SpaceX rocket technology could put lives at risk” · View on HN

kensNov 2011Cites it

A few random comments: There's a video of the Soyuz explosion mentioned above at ▶ this video that shows the escape system saving the crew. The use of solid rocket boosters for human space flight (as was planned for Ares I) is hugely controversial because they can't just be shut down in the event of a problem, as regular engines can, making survivability more difficult. Personally, I think NASA is overly risk-adverse, to the point that nothing gets accomplished (see Constellation / Ares I). An interesting article on this is [link] On the topic of aircraft turbine failures, there's the interesting case of a DC-10 engine that disintegrated in flight due to a pilot experiment, killing a passenger. For details see: [link] Finally, if you're interested in SpaceX, NASA budgeting, and so forth, I recommend [link]

in “Is SpaceX changing the rocket equation?” · View on HN

Topics & tags

Space exploration & spaceflightMilitary history & warfaresoyuz t-10-1launch abortrocket explosionspaceflight safetyescape tower