Speedy Cutover Service, SXS switching cutover to ESS filmed live at Glendale CA central office, 1984

This[1] is a great video on the topic of cutovers. Not quite downtime-less, but seriously impressive little amount of downtime in any case. [1] ▶ this video

in “In 1930, the 22M-pound Indiana Bell building was rotated 90 degrees” · View on HN

There's an old AT&T video showing the careful coordination and huge amount of manpower needed to upgrade a single telco switch. They had rows of workers with cable cutters, in order to literally cut the entire service over to the new equipment. Total downtime was just 47 seconds. (And even during the cutover, they're careful not to interrupt any emergency calls.) ▶ this video

in “911 emergency services go down across the US after CenturyLink outage” · View on HN

Unrelated, but the title made me think of this video where AT&T failed over old switch frames to new ones by manually cutting all the cable bundles, very dramatic. ▶ this video (Speedy Cutover Service, SXS switching cutover to ESS filmed live at Glendale CA central office, 1984)

in “Mainframe upgrade done with wire cutters (2010)” · View on HN

There's some videos on the AT&T Tech Channel on YouTube that show inside the CO, like this one for the "Speedy cutover service": ▶ this video

in “Telephone Line Rural Outside Plant” · View on HN

The central office switch that a landline is connected to is almost certainly doing analog/digital conversion. Digital switches were introduced in the 1970s and Analog exchanges were all but extinct by 2000 (according to [4], the last step by step exchange in Canada was replaced in 2002). If the call remains old school POTS, it will be essentially a T1/PRI call from that point on. Circuit switched digital calling was phased in over time, as CO switches were replaced. Chances are, a landline is actually handled by a remote terminal out in the field, and a/d converted there. Long distance (to most destinations) calling probably switched to digital trunks faster than local calling, because long distance calling was already separate equipment from local calling, and replacing central office switches is a big process (including a pretty intense cutover [1]). Long distance calling would have more equipment in the path than a local call, of course, and may not have had very optimal routing paths compared to today. I found a route map from the 1960 AT&T Long Lines network [2], and a fiber map with no provenance of 'today' [3] ... it's widely similar, but there's some routes that pop out at me as not being well connected in the 1960: Salt Lake City to Seattle; Amarillo, TX to Dallas, TX. On the other hand, Long Lines was radio, and radio is faster than fiber, so that makes up a little. There may have also been more cases where routing was simplified to be more manageable at the expens

in “Latency of old school landline calls vs. modern video calls?” · View on HN

Ma Bell had some ill ill communication. Those were the days, when the real paperclip payphone trick still worked. I'm not even sure pay-phones still exist in the Western world unless they're Tardises. Btw, here's a video from her vault about an actual cutover done in 45 seconds with a few dozen folks with big garden cutters: ▶ this video PS: I'm so old, I remember the days of operators, telephone books and fingers doing the walking. :) Speaking of old meets new, I recently used an antique rotary phone that's built into a brass end-table to diagnose an Xfinity VOIP call issue. It still works.

in “In 1986 Microsoft advertised Windows was available “except in Nebraska”. Why?” · View on HN