Stephen Wolfram: Cellular Automata, Computation, and Physics | Lex Fridman Podcast #89
Stephen Wolfram: Cellular Automata, Computation, and Physics | Lex Fridman Podcast #89 on HackerTube: recommended by 4 Hacker News commenters across 4 separate months, 2020–2023.
Lex Fridman interviews Stephen Wolfram for about three hours on cellular automata, computation, the Wolfram Physics Project and his career with Mathematica and Wolfram Alpha.
What HN commenters said
7 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.
PilottwaveApr 2022Strongly recommends
Lots of comments about his "arrogance" but i just see someone passionate, judge for yourself! He has three long interviews on Lex Fridmans youtube channel! I greatly enjoyed watching those those. 1:[Stephen Wolfram: Cellular Automata, Computation, and Physics]( ▶ this video ) 2:[Stephen Wolfram: Fundamental Theory of Physics, Life, and the Universe]( [link] ) 3: [Stephen Wolfram: Complexity and the Fabric of Reality ]( [link] )
in “We’ve got a science opportunity overload: Launching the Wolfram Institute” · View on HN
SuoDuanDaoNov 2022Recommends
Regarding reading suggestions, you'd probably like Wolfram's cellular Automata theory. accessible intro: ▶ this video
in “What You (Want to)* Want” · View on HN
erikigNov 2021Recommends
I still use it regularly too - even more so after listening to Stephen Wolfram’s 3 part podcast [1] with Lex Fridman where he discussed the latest developments in Wolfram, Mathematica etc [1] ▶ this video
in “Ask HN: Whatever happened to Wolfram Alpha?” · View on HN
__sJun 2020Recommends
Random math doesn't imply intelligence: [link] is that shell intelligent? Wolfram has an alright interview where he considers this: ▶ this video My own thoughts: intelligence is something which you need to observe predicting the future, ie something proactively reacting to the future in order to achieve a goal. This means ideally you have a bit of interaction so that you can see that you're interacting with is capable of learning in response to you
in “Odds of communicating with 36 other possible intelligent civilizations are small” · View on HN
DonHopkinsJan 2023Cites it
I am a huge fan of Sandspiel, which Max described in this article from 2019, and recently I was delighted to discover that he and TodePond have been doing a huge amount of wonderful work since then. What happens when you combine Sandspiel with a Scratch-like blocks based visual programming language that lets you look inside and see how rules work, tweak and modify them, and even define your own rules for different types of particles? And then form a community around it for sharing Here is Max's and TodePond's brilliantly ambitious visually programmable sequel, Sandspiel Studio! [link] Here's my profile, where you can play with the version of Max's flower growing rule that he shows here: [link] ...to grow underground potatoes and fancy flowers: [link] I've written more about Sandspeil Studio and related topics of artificial life, cellular automata, and visual programming, and quoted some interesting discussion with Max and TodePond from their Discord server (they actually already knew about most of this stuff, but they love it as much as I do), in the "Ask HN: What weird technical scene are you fond/part of?" discussion, in reply to api's comment about Digital Artificial Life: [link] api 67 days ago | parent | context | favorite | on: Ask HN: What weird technical scene are you fond/pa... Digital Artificial Life -- as in evolving program ecosystems, artificial chemistries or cellular automata that can manifest life-like phenomena, etc. Haven't done much with it in a while but w
in “Making Sandspiel” · View on HN
DonHopkinsNov 2022Cites it
That's one of my long time interests and hobbies, which I write about on HN and discuss with other people frequently. I'm supposed to be doing something else right now so I'll quickly drop a few disorganized quotes and links here. (Sorry I didn't have time to be more concise!) A few years ago I ran across Max Bittker's beautiful "Sandspiel", which is a delightful cellular automata toy that simulates sand and other rules: [link] A few days ago I saw him tweet some amazing stuff that resonated with me, which then led me to discover what he's been working with Lu Wilson (TodePond): Sandspiel Studio -- user definable rules using a block based visual programming language. [link] "working on goth fungus kidpix": [link] Lu Wilson (TodePond): [link] Sandspiel Studio: [link] Sandspiel introduction: [link] Sandspiel Studio in 60 seconds: [link] Rainbow Sand: [link] Huegene: [link] Flower: [link] TodePond's Spellular Automata: [link] We had a great discussion on the Sandspiel Studio Discord server, where I posted some interesting links: Check out the Long Now Foundation talk by Brian Eno and Will Wright about Generative Systems: 10:39 minute excerpt of Will talking about cellular automata and demonstrating with Mirak's Cellebration: [link] 6:48 minute excerpt of Will demonstrating Spore Metaverses: [link] 6:29 minute excerpt of Will demonstrating Spore Creature Demo: [link] Entire 1:38:50 hour Long Now Foundation talk: Playing with Time | Brian Eno and Will Wright [link] Craig Reynolds
in “Ask HN: What weird technical scene are you fond/part of?” · View on HN
Show 1 more comment
rubber_duckJun 2020Critical
I recently watched a podcast with Stephen Wolfram (few months old) where he runs a photo of himself through Wolfram Alpha "ImageIdentify" and it classifies him as a plunger with 50% probability and 8% probability it's a human [1]. He then goes on saying how he's working on systems that would allow a self driving system decide what to do based on if the collision detected is a human or inanimate object, etc. This was just one particularly ironic example of what I'm seeing with ML - we saw this level of accuracy in classification years ago - where is the enormous progress ? There have been pockets where ML shows it's applicable with encouraging initial results but after that it seems to me that we suck at perfecting those system and the progress has been incremental at best. The only exception I can see is stuff like self-play where the system can generate insane amount of training data. [1] ▶ this video
in “An understanding of AI’s limitations is starting to sink in” · View on HN