The Fermi Paradox: Dark Forest Theory

A lot of thought has gone into this and other possible explanations. Isaac Arthur, of course, has an excellent video [1] on this issue. His entire library on the Fermi Paradox is worth watching. The short version of why this seems unlikely is that there really is no hiding a K2 civilization for many reasons. For example, access to this much energy and having a megastructure as large as the Solar System (give or take) would allow you to create incredibly high resolution telescopes (with an without interferometry). But consider this: if you, as a spacefaring civilization, want to be left alone, the best way to do it is to make sure nobody comes into your neighbourhood. If you "hide" that may happen accidentally. Isn't it better to advertise your presence and otherwise keep people away to avoid unintentional conflict? [1]: ▶ this video

in “Seven Dyson Sphere Candidates” · View on HN

I also had a similar feeling after finishing the book, this video ▶ this video made some good points, mainly finding problems with the axioms so it convinced me that the conclusion in the book is probably wrong since the axioms are probably not true.

in “The Dark Forest Theory of the Internet” · View on HN

This video gives a more optimistic perspective, ▶ this video it challenges with good arguments the axioms in The Dark Forest.

in “Hayabusa-2: Japan Spacecraft Touches Down on Asteroid” · View on HN

The books and all are nice but the Dark Forest Theory doesn't hold agains much scrutiny. Among other reasons because if that were true we would be already dead. ▶ this video

in “Have we already been visited by aliens?” · View on HN