Skip to content
HHackerTube.videoSurprise me

"This Machine Greens" - Bitcoin Documentary - Online Premiere

"This Machine Greens" - Bitcoin Documentary - Online Premiere on HackerTube: recommended by 5 Hacker News commenters across 3 separate months, 2021–2022.

Swan Bitcoin

documentary · dated

Open on YouTube

A documentary from Swan Bitcoin exploring Bitcoin's relationship with energy, featuring Lyn Alden and others, and arguing that mining is a net positive for the environment and not wasteful.

Why Hacker News recommends it

Bitcoin advocates on HN cite it to rebut energy-consumption and waste criticisms, though it is an advocacy piece from a Bitcoin company.

people recommended it
5
separate months
3
strong recommendations
1
discussed on HN
2021–2022
“This video also does a great job of addressing the "waste" by elaborating on "unforgable costliness”
— easymovet, Sep 2021, in “Bitcoin's growing e-waste problem”

What HN commenters said

7 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.

nk1tzSep 2021Strongly recommends

Bitcoin is a "machine that greens". It will drive sustainable energy development in an emergent free market fashion and take us to a type 1 civilization. ▶ this video Fix the money, fix the world.

in “Bitcoin's growing e-waste problem” · View on HN

lumannnnMar 2022Recommends

[link] - "Bitcoin & Renewable Energy Transition - Bitcoin Incentivizes Green Energy" [link] - "Can Bitcoin Mining Save the Environment? with Troy Cross" [link] - "This Machine Greens" ▶ this video

in “Ask HN: Software with biggest potential for positive impact in 5 years?” · View on HN

QuindecillionJan 2022Recommends

Bitcoin's energy consumption is a feature, not a bug. The amount of energy consumed by the network will continue to increase, as it should, as it secures more wealth. A currency that's based on energy has been speculated about for decades, such as by Buckminster Fuller, which he called the Kilowatt Dollar: [link] Bitcoin is the first attempt at such a money that might actually work. [link] If you're curious about the connection between Bitcoin and the energy sector these are worth looking at. * [link] * [link] * ▶ this video * [link]

in “Mozilla Foundation pausing cryptocurrency donations” · View on HN

easymovetSep 2021Recommends

Once you find out you'll panic about not having enough. The benefits are apparent when analyzed from the perspective of money as a technology that enables strong property rights defended by cryptography. Robert Breedlove does a podcast on the nature of money which great. This video also does a great job of addressing the "waste" by elaborating on "unforgable costliness" : ▶ this video All of these "uses energy per transaction" people are being underserved by their news sources on the development of the lightning network, which is like going from a LAN with global broadcast to NATed and routed TCP/IP (Bitcoin is a global broadcast layer and lightning is a transaction bundling / routing layer/network). I mean an entire country has adopted it and we still have folks on hacker news missing the disruption for the trees!

in “Bitcoin's growing e-waste problem” · View on HN

OffpicsSep 2021Recommends

You should educate yourself. Energy consumption is an old myth and cryptocurrency pushes a lot of innovations in this field. There is a great documentary on this ▶ this video .

in “China declares cryptocurrency deals ‘illegal’” · View on HN

glenvdbOct 2021Cites it

Lots of people disagree with you about that. Sorry you see it as a waste, but we're going to keep using it and dedicating more energy towards it because we understand its value. ▶ this video

in “Bitcoin is a Ponzi” · View on HN

Show 1 more comment
glenvdbOct 2021Cites it

Scroll down to the bar chart showing the country rankings. Look at the top 3 countries (China, US, India). Compare those to Bitcoin... can you honestly tell me that Bitcoin constitutes a significant amount of energy consumption in that context? And it's also worth noting that energy consumption isn't necessarily bad for climate change. You're conflating "energy consumption" with "CO2 emissions". It's CO2 emissions that are the problem, and Bitcoin energy consumption is far more green than most other industries. So we have a monetary network that consumes a globally insignificant amount of energy and is more green than many other industries... is it really a significant problem? [link] ▶ this video

in “Bitcoin is a Ponzi” · View on HN

Topics & tags

CryptographyRenewables, batteries & storageClimate policy, solutions & debatebitcoin miningenergy consumptiongreen energylyn aldencryptocurrency