WOKE BRANDS

Honestly think at this point I should recommend hbomberguy’s video on “Woke Brands”. ▶ this video I’ll appreciate his politics are way to the left of yours and he’s making this point for a left wing audience, but the TL;DR is: a lot of what you’re perceiving as politics here is literally the market economy acting to maximise profit. His perspective is that _left-wing_ people shouldn’t be conned into thinking this is about anything other than profit maximisation.

in “The quiet death of Ello's big dreams” · View on HN

That's such an incredibly sad world view and misunderstanding of the parasitic nature of capitalism playing both sides for maximum financial gain I'd recommend educating yourself further on the reality of what you're blaming "the left" for ▶ this video

in “Tesla battle with Swedish unions spreads to Denmark” · View on HN

This sort of ties in nicely to the "WOKE BRANDS" video[1] that came out recently from H. Bomberguy. It's a bit lengthy but it goes into a very poignant discussion of the problematic underpinnings of brands adopting a particular aspect of a "personality", namely a hypocritical social conscience. [1] ▶ this video

in “Minimum Viable Personality (2011)” · View on HN

One huge problem with cancel culture is how mercurial it is. So we get to witness spectacles like an attempt to cancel Nike for selling products in Israel[1] or for hiring Colin Kaepernick[2] instead of for their ongoing record of labor abuses. And, in general, "cancelling" often seems to focus on topical, hot-button issues instead of deeper-rooted problems. The whole phenomenon is ripe for manipulation and viral marketing - leveraging short-term outrage to build brand identity[3]. One could argue it's the commodification and commercialization of "real" protest. It's less democracy and more idiocracy. [1] [link] [2] [link] [3] ▶ this video

in “TikTok is harming children at an industrial scale” · View on HN

> While your individual action may be of no consequence to Google, it still has a marginal impact. If we round off and assume Google has 2 billion customers, then your marginal impact is 0.00000005%. That doesn't do anything at all. > Google won't need to change their behavior until enough people leave This is based on the assumption that the only action one can and should take against Google is an individual disconnection from their services. This is pointless compared to meaningful changes through systemic means. I know HN has a lot of libertarian/rationalist economist types, but that ideological approach has been shown time and again to accomplish nothing, to the point where brands actively encourage "vote with your wallet" boycotts from conservatives because they are actually extemely profitable ( ▶ this video ). I'd also point out the libertarianism/rationalism is rooted in neoliberalism and the whole point of neoliberalism is to remove challenges to corporate power, so of course they would encourage actions that do nothing to really harm corporate power while feeling like you're doing something. It's the consumer activism equivalent of donating £5/month to charity to assuage your first-world guilt.

in “Data trading for ad revenue must be regulated” · View on HN

What you are describing is a common leftist trolling tactic that is highly effective. Here is a video on woke brands that describes the process. ▶ this video essentially they take a person that Is in some protected class or group, make them say something thats slightly left but not super controversial, then invite right wing trolls to the party and give the trolls a bunch of publicity while playing victim. It’s a super popular viral market strategy right now.

in “Trolls Are Swarming Young Climate Activists Online” · View on HN