Skip to content
HHackerTube.videoSurprise me

DEFCON 21 - DNS May Be Hazardous to Your Health - Robert Stucke

DEFCON 21 - DNS May Be Hazardous to Your Health - Robert Stucke on HackerTube: recommended by 1 Hacker News commenter across 1 month, 2013–2016.

Robert Stucke (bobhex)

talk · intermediate · evergreen

Open on YouTube

A DEFCON 21 talk by Robert Stucke on DNS errors caused by single-bit flips, which lead to requests for misspelled domains. It shows real-world data on bitsquatting.

Why Hacker News recommends it

Cited in threads on ECC memory, CPU reliability, and bitsquatting as evidence that bit flips cause real DNS misdirection.

people recommended it
1
separate months
1
strong recommendations
0
discussed on HN
2013–2016
“you might find the DEFCON talk on single bit domain errors relevant”
— aimhb, Dec 2013, in “CPU reliability – Linus Torvalds (2007)”

What HN commenters said

4 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.

aimhbDec 2013Recommends

It was posted here on HN a few days ago, but you might find the DEFCON talk on single bit domain errors relevant: ▶ this video In summary, some data centers are run hotter than recommended, which leads to a lot of mostly ignored domain resolution errors, which leads to a security risk.

in “CPU reliability – Linus Torvalds (2007)” · View on HN

voltagex_Aug 2016Cites it

>We have registered all possible domains that are one bit flip away from ubuntu.com and debian.org. We would like to hand these domains over to the correct authority. Please get in touch if you think you are one. Aha! [link] is a talk about "bitsquatting" along the same lines. I'm sure I've seen a newer talk about it too Edit: ▶ this video is the other video, which also looks at the behaviour of various clients

in “Flip Feng Shui: A new cross-VM exploitation vector” · View on HN

vox_mollisNov 2015Cites it

This cannot possibly be right. There was a DC21 talk regarding DNS request misfires due to bit flips in non-ECC DRAM, and the researcher was able to collect a surprisingly large number of requests on the basis of this. Edit: found it: ▶ this video

in “To ECC or Not to ECC” · View on HN

vezzy-fnordDec 2013Cites it

The homoglyph attack is a very old and often abused technique. A related, though not identical one, is bit flipping where a single character is swapped in a domain name and you prey on those who make misspellings. It turns out, however, that it isn't even necessary for someone to make a blatant error like that... ▶ this video [DEFCON 21: DNS May Be Hazardous To Your Health]

in “Is Unicode Safe?” · View on HN

Topics & tags

Security & hackingNetworking & internet infrastructurebitsquattingdnsecc memorydefconsecurity