How We Solved the Worst Minigame in Zelda's History
How We Solved the Worst Minigame in Zelda's History on HackerTube: recommended by 3 Hacker News commenters across 3 separate months, 2020–2024.
Linkus7 explains how a community reverse-engineered The Wind Waker to predict its random number generator and beat the Sploosh Kaboom battleship minigame consistently. It includes d3 animations by Peter Schmidt-Nielsen.
What HN commenters said
5 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.
nick238Jul 2024Recommends
If you're developing a game, there's a fairly big issue in that many things may be requesting values from, and thus incrementing, the PRNG, and many of them could be indirectly controlled by the user (where they are, where they're looking, etc. ▶ this video is a fun video about reverse-engineering Zelda to predict the randomness in a minigame) As far as the approach, I agree in that I don't understand why 'no code changes' is that important, especially in the context of Python which has a general attitude of consent towards monkeypatching code. Maybe one of the randomness sources was hashing all the source files? :P
in “Making Python Less Random” · View on HN
mbStavolaJul 2023Recommends
The sheer depth of knowledge and analytical ability pannenkoek has is honestly quite amazing. I've become quite spoiled watching their SM64 videos, it's been incredibly hard to find something of similar rigor and production value for other games. The closest I've found so far has been a video on how a group of speed runners were able to conquer RNG for a puzzle in Wind waker[0]. [0]: ▶ this video
in “Super Mario 64 – Watch for Rolling Rocks – 0.5x a Presses [video]” · View on HN
leshokuninSep 2020Recommends
Excellent video. I'm impressed the author went to recreate the run frame by frame, and then used those findings to analyze what was happening. Never expected this video to turn into a full on reverse engineering explanation. As a side note, this kind of speed run has become more popular in the recent years for a combination of reasons: - First, it's difficult to improve on the regular world records since they're so optimized (just have a look at Quake Done Quick and its sequels). - Second, the emulators available to the speed running community have evolved. They now include better ways to track what's happening in memory. - Third, the games themselves are understood better (as recently exemplified by the Super Mario 64 full reverse engineering). So it's creating a whole new genre of runs that simply isn't about execution anymore. If you're interested in the topic, you might like the Super Mario World speed run that uses a similar technique ( [link] ), or the recent work on removing randomness from Wind Waker runs ( ▶ this video ).
in “Super Mario Bros. 3 in 3 Minutes – World Record Speedrun Explained [video]” · View on HN
TapamNApr 2021Cites it
That's true. I did think about mentioning this possibility, but decided not to. Another good example of predicting RNG, after a large amount of gameplay, for a non-turn-based game: ▶ this video I think in certain Pokemon games, people figured out how to predict and manipulate random encounters based on an animation in the load screen.
in “PCG32: The Perfect PRNG for Roguelikes (2018)” · View on HN
BorisTheBraveJul 2020Cites it
Good point. That approach was in fact used for "Sploosh Kaboom", a RNG minigame in the Windwaker: ▶ this video
in “Is every game of Slay the Spire winnable?” · View on HN