Plastic Recycling is an Actual Scam | Climate Town on HackerTube: recommended by 5 Hacker News commenters across 4 separate months, 2021–2026.
explainer · evergreen
Climate Town gives a comedic, fast-paced account of how the plastics industry promoted recycling, including the resin-code recycling symbol, while knowing most plastic could not be economically recycled. It points viewers to the Frontline documentary Plastic Wars for a deeper treatment.
Commenters send it as a short, entertaining explanation of why people believe plastic is recyclable and how industry PR created that belief.
“This video is under 10mins and features a lot of the PR adverts.”
7 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.
This youtube video explains why plastic recycling exists, how it's mostly ineffective and why is it a scam created to normalize one-use plastic. This basically applies to electronics and others. "Why would I reuse or reduce, I can buy, consume an recycle". ▶ this video
in “There's a ridiculous amount of tech in a disposable vape” · View on HN
It makes a lot of sense. Corporations make more money the more junk they produce. If you have 10 minutes I recommend watching this video about how the lobby groups invented the whole idea of recycling plastic with the little numbered resin identification code that looks like a recycling symbol. ▶ this video
in “Plastics producers deceived public about recycling, report reveals” · View on HN
A lot of things you'd think can be recycled actually can't be. This video gives a good overview about the reason this belief is so prevalent.: ▶ this video
in “Scientists Say Recycling Has Backfired Spectacularly” · View on HN
> Why do we buy so much single-use packaging It's designed to be that way by the PR guys that created the plastic recycling logo. This video is under 10mins and features a lot of the PR adverts. ▶ this video
in “Scientists Say Recycling Has Backfired Spectacularly” · View on HN
Would it surprise you to hear that the plastics industry came up with that symbol in order to make it confusing to the layperson to differentiate between recyclables and single-use plastics? "Source" (not a primary source): ▶ this video <-- which has some links to further reading/viewing and a few sources.
in “California aims to ban recycling symbols on things that aren’t recyclable” · View on HN
Okidokey: [link] and specifically ▶ this video so there you go. Plastic recycling, because of what plastics are, is basically impossible at cost. PET recycling might make you think "see, we can recycle plastics" but first and foremost, PET recycling isn't recycling, it's reuse (using the PET as a base material to make something else, like fleece, which cannot be recycled), and second: the majority of plastics aren't PET and literally have no recycling path.
in “University of Alabama Engineer Pioneers New Process for Recycling Plastics” · View on HN
Individual action alone cannot stem climate change and mass plastic pollution. All the cheapest food is packaged in single-use plastic. All the cheapest clothes and toys are made of plastic. One simply cannot opt out of this system without making massive, potentially ostrasizing changes to one's life. Many/most cannot afford fancy plastic-free goods. Most plastic pollution in the ocean is directly related to shipping and in particular fishing[0]. Nothing I can do individually can address this, change must come from World leaders and industry bodies working in good faith across international borders. They all know this is happening, they all know measures that could be taken to address it. Much of the framing of climate change and pollution as individual responsibility comes from large industry bodies themselves, who would much rather you feel guilty about it personally rather than wonder if they might be to blame.[1] [0]: [link] [1]: Plastic Recycling is an Actual Scam | Climate Town ▶ this video
in “Brazilian researchers find 'terrifying' plastic rocks on remote island” · View on HN