20 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.
LeChuckJul 2024Recommends
A city designed for other modes of transport is also better for drivers because only those who need (or really want) to drive need to do so. Result, less congestion and more relaxed driving. If you have 15 minutes to spare, watch this video: ▶ this video
in “If we want a shift to walking, we need to prioritize dignity” · View on HN
_dain_Mar 2023Recommends
Most (or at least, a plurality of) people who cycle or take the tube in London also drive a car sometimes; it's not like you have to be wedded to one particular transport mode. Drivers aren't drivers 100% of the time. Reducing motor traffic makes for safer, more aesthetically pleasant streets. You can expand the pavement, have flowers, landscaping, public art, outdoor dining, etc. The air quality is better, the surroundings are quieter, people don't get run over and maimed in collisions. And when you really want or need to drive, there's less traffic around. Nobody likes sitting in traffic jams! See this video for how these kinds of policies benefit drivers directly[1]. The carrot is having a more pleasant city. Everyone wins from that. [1] ▶ this video
in “Cyclists Now Outnumber Motorists in City of London” · View on HN
Kim_BruningSep 2022Recommends
So the actual challenge is to convince those car drivers that they really should be pushing for more bike lanes, since it really is in their best interest. O:-) For more arguments than can fit in this margin, see: ▶ this video "The Best Country in the World for Drivers" (edit: +if you don't have time for an entire video, just watch this one traffic light for single example that exemplifies the story: [link] ... comments on that video are good too!)
in “Bikes, not self driving cars, are the technological gateway to urban progress” · View on HN
Show 14 more comments
xputerJul 2022Recommends
Both are definitely a factor, but don't forget that a lot of the irritate driving behavior is because in America people are forced to drive. Even if they don't want to or really shouldn't be driving, they still have to drive to get around town. Here is a video that explains it further: ▶ this video
in “Why we ignore thousands of daily car crashes” · View on HN
ImprovotterDec 2021Recommends
I think this is due to how car dependent North America is. There are so many aspects that are missed in these pictures or what you are for example experiencing. It's not that you're situation is improving, it's most likely not. But that's not due to car independent cities being bad, it's because changing from being car dependent to car independent is hard and takes time. I would recommend you have a look at Not Just Bikes on YouTube, a Canadian that moved to the Netherlands. He talks about car independent cities in Europe, more specifically The Netherlands and compares it to car dependent North America. Here is a video that talks about how these "car independent" countries are still the best to drive in compared to others: ▶ this video . Regardless, I would recommend you check out a few other of his videos, most importantly his series on the US non profit organisation "Strong Towns": [link] . It think it's about sharing the message that placing public transport, cyclists, and pedestrians in the forefront is better for almost everyone involved, including drivers, and especially people who live in cities and towns.
in “Changes in Dutch streets throughout the years (photo album)” · View on HN
cultofmetatronNov 2021Recommends
I've been watching a channel that really opened my eyes on how terrible urban planning is in america. ▶ this video
in “Designing transport for humans, not econs” · View on HN
dublinbenMar 2024Cites it
Even as a driver, if you think about the second-order effects of getting more (other) people out of their cars, it becomes obvious that it would improve traffic for you. An enlightened self-interested driver would want to increase investment in alternatives to driving, since that is the only proven solution for congestion. As a video: ▶ this video
in “Paris cycling numbers double in one year thanks to investment” · View on HN
throw0101aAug 2023Cites it
> I kind of like his ideas (I know the channel), but he’s heavily biased against cars. He’s the “everything could be done on a bike” type of guy. It's kind of hard to over emphasize the the damage they've done, specifically as forms of personal transportation (versus more commercial transport). He does have a video called "The Best Country in the World for Drivers", in which he shows that by reducing the need for cars for most people, actually helps the optimize things for operating a car: * ▶ this video And until the ~1920s, societies managed to function pretty well without the streets being taken over by cars: * [link] I don't see why they need to have total priority with-in cities to the extant they currently do.
in “Amsterdam to use “noise cameras” against too loud cars” · View on HN
throw0101cApr 2023Cites it
> […] considering the transit with the lowest capital investment, the bus, is also benefited by car oriented development like a road network with more connections between nodes. 'Improving' car-oriented development has been observed to make things worse: > It is a paradox in that improvements in the road network will not reduce traffic congestion. Improvements in the road network can make congestion worse if the improvements make public transport more inconvenient or if they shift investment, causing disinvestment in the public transport system. * [link] Improving things for non-car users can actually make things better for drivers: * ▶ this video * [link] * [link]
in “Maps show how parking lots “eat” U.S. cities” · View on HN
CalRobertMar 2023Cites it
That makes sense, the excellent infrastructure in the Netherlands makes it a very pleasant place to drive. ▶ this video
in “Cyclists Now Outnumber Motorists in City of London” · View on HN
oblioDec 2022Cites it
▶ this video As a driver you want everyone to be walking, cycling, taking the bus/trolley/tram/train/... Why? Because you'd be alone on the road.
in “Tesla Semi, a Deep Dive” · View on HN
ackfoobarSep 2022Cites it
Yet another video from NJB on this topic. ▶ this video Chuck Marohn measured his average speed at rush hour, and found it was about 16km/h ... So despite the roads having a speed limit of 50 km/h or more, his average speed was less than 16, because of all the traffic lights. And this was in a tiny town of only 14,000 people. Incidentally, 16 km/h is the average speed of a cyclist in Amsterdam
in “Bikes, not self driving cars, are the technological gateway to urban progress” · View on HN
shlurpySep 2022Cites it
Empirically, most people care more about making the trip efficiently then how exactly it's done. If all those people are motivated to not use cars, think of how much less traffic there will be for everyone else? It turns out that bike and pedestrian friendly cities are also some of the most car friendly ones for this reason. ▶ this video
in “Should traffic lights be abolished? (2021)” · View on HN
wbsss4412Aug 2022Cites it
That’s why it’s important to help people understand that’s it’s not about eliminating cars entirely, but about substituting significant numbers of trips. The YouTube channel NotJustBikes has gained a lot of notoriety over the last couple of years, and he made an interesting point that driving is more pleasant in Amsterdam. [0] The issue is mainly car dependency not cars per se. [0] ▶ this video
in “Ask HN: What's the next big thing that few people are talking about?” · View on HN
noahtallenJun 2022Cites it
I definitely agree with the latter paragraph. But it’s important to note that places like Amsterdam did invest heavily into car infrastructure as well. It’s not completely true that car dependency was staved off by existing road sizes. Like you allude to, the US was bulldozed for the automobile. We didn’t develop around it. Amsterdam was following a similar path until mass protests in the 70s about people being slaughtered by cars. ( [link] ) And over the past several decades, they have made vast changes and redevelopments that we should have been following as well. And now Amsterdam isn’t just amazing for cyclists and pedestrians… it’s also great for driving. ( ▶ this video )
in “Investigating the effects of bike lanes in Minneapolis” · View on HN
RendelloDec 2021Cites it
My observations: I grew up in Northern Ontario, where the cities are basically long stroads. Inside of a car, they can be stressful to drive in, as they combine high-speed travel with frequent and awkward turns. God forbid you want to walk or bike next to one of them. The noise is extreme, and the infrastructure surrounding them is horrid. Whether in a car, on a bike, or on foot, they are ugly and soul-crushing. The patio bar next to a stroad isn't going to be people's first choice. I haven't been to the Netherlands myself, but it appears that after moving away from stroads and "car-centric" infrastructure, the driving is actually much faster and more pleasant [1]. It gives me hope at least! 1. ▶ this video
in “How do you fix a stroad?” · View on HN
drivers99Nov 2021Cites it
Have you seen Not Just Bikes' latest video? "Why the Netherlands is the Best Country for Drivers" ▶ this video
in “The Stroad” · View on HN