Skip to content
HHackerTube.videoSurprise me

The Next Major RTS Will Fail. This Is Why.

The Next Major RTS Will Fail. This Is Why. on HackerTube: recommended by 2 Hacker News commenters across 2 separate months, 2023–2024.

GiantGrantGames

commentary · dated

Open on YouTube

A video essay arguing that the next major real-time strategy game will fail unless it gets the fundamentals right. It covers the playerbase and demographics, what older RTS games did well, and the roles of the engine, spectacle, development tools and player-generated content.

Why Hacker News recommends it

HN recommends it for its argument that single-player campaigns and modding are overlooked in RTS design.

people recommended it
2
separate months
2
strong recommendations
0
discussed on HN
2023–2024
“makes a compelling case for why single-player campaign and mod-development experiences are often overlooked”
— btown, Oct 2023, in “Microsoft $69B deal to buy Call of Duty maker Activision Blizzard cleared by UK”

What HN commenters said

3 Hacker News comments link this video. Each one links back to its thread.

ixwtJan 2024Recommends

GiantGrantGames on Youtube made an interesting video about "The Next Major RTS Will Fail. This is Why"[0]. Turns out he got a lot of this information because he was one of the players that had a huge influence in the development, and this is what ZeroSpace focused their development efforts on. One of which, is targeting the casual audience, and their love for a good story. [0]: ▶ this video

in “Microsoft lays off 1,900 Activision Blizzard and Xbox employees” · View on HN

btownOct 2023Recommends

Giant Grant Games makes a compelling case for why single-player campaign and mod-development experiences are often overlooked but are key for RTS crossover success. And this came out long before the success of BG3. I hold out hope that someone will crack the formula! ▶ this video

in “Microsoft $69B deal to buy Call of Duty maker Activision Blizzard cleared by UK” · View on HN

shagieFeb 2024Cites it

In my stumbling around YouTube in the past week, I found "The Next Major RTS Will Fail. This Is Why" - ▶ this video The publishers have listened to their hard core players - and created games for them. Is Diablo III for the people doing seasons? or the people who play through the campaign in solo mode? With modern games, this in turn means that the casual to competitive conversion rate is low (because of the lack of solo content to hook the casual players) and publishers look to milk more from the competitive players by making the game even less accessible. The games are being developed as multiplayer first today... and that in turn means that the solo modes that the casual games aren't there. Honestly, if MMO is one of the first things listed on a game, and solo content is lacking - that gets a "nope" or "meh" from me on Steam. Meanwhile, some fun old games I still pull up from time to time to play.

in “Cactus – A Modern Diablo II Version Switcher, Character Isolator, & Mod Manager” · View on HN

Topics & tags

Game designGaming culture & analysisIndie game developmentrtsmoddingsingle-player campaignsgame industryplayer-generated content